Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Discussion about formulations and resolution techniques of electrical machine design problems

Abstract : In this paper, we discuss, through a simple example, the impact of two different but equivalent formulations used by standard local optimization solvers (here fmincon of MatLab). We show that even if the two formulations are equivalent in a mathematical sense (no loss of global optima) it is not completely true in a numerical way; using 1000 starting points, we show that it is quite difficult for the designer to find a starting point yielding a convergence of the algorithm to a local minimum and to find better points yielding the global solution (previously found using a global optimization algorithm). Furthermore, we discuss how to deal with the insertion of the integer variable p, representing the number of pole pairs of the machine, inside the problem of design which uses a standard local continuous optimization code to be solved.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [14 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-enac.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00938437
Contributor : Laurence Porte <>
Submitted on : Monday, May 5, 2014 - 4:08:14 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, May 6, 2020 - 5:44:10 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, August 5, 2014 - 10:56:08 AM

File

Cafieri_ICEM2010.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Sonia Cafieri, Leo Liberti, Frédéric Messine, Bertrand Nogarede. Discussion about formulations and resolution techniques of electrical machine design problems. ICEM 2010, XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines, Sep 2010, Rome, Italy. pp 1-5, ⟨10.1109/ICELMACH.2010.5607836⟩. ⟨hal-00938437⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

643

Files downloads

291